Tai Chi, Qigong, and Tucking the Pelvis
Our teachers often field questions about tucking the pelvis for Tai Chi and Qigong. It is frequently perceived that Tai Chi recommends tucking the pelvis as part of a baseline stance, purportedly to facilitate “the Qi to flow unimpeded.” It’s a central tenet in Gokhale Method® philosophy that the baseline pelvic position be anteverted, and that tucking the pelvis is a “wrong turn” Western society took about a century ago (think flapper posture). So students who encounter a seemingly exactly opposite guideline or model in Tai Chi are understandably confused.
We have three qualified Tai Chi/Qigong teachers in our teacher community, including Kathleen O’Donohue and Roberta Cooks, who teach the Moving Meditation sessions of our Gokhale® Active program, and Julie Johnson, who teaches in her hometown, Öhringen, in Germany. My experience of Tai Chi was while studying TCM acupuncture in Nanjing, China in 1989. Lang Liu, though not a Tai Chi teacher, teaches Gokhale Active Yoga and has practiced another martial art, Capoeira, for many decades. We teachers have discussed our experiences and the apparent discrepancies in “tucking” guidelines in detail.
Kathleen is the most experienced of the trio of Gokhale Method teachers who have also taught Tai Chi or Qigong. Kathleen started learning Tai Chi in 1985 with her teacher Professor Chi, Quan Wen, and has this to say:
My first teacher had fled mainland China to Taiwan, where he was taught by the eminent teacher Cheng Man-Ch’ing. He taught in Chinese, with one student occasionally translating into English. We did not need a translation into English for his jokes, we just joined in his infectious laughter because he was so funny, and such a sweet man. The point of recalling this history in detail is that I was never, ever, taught to tuck the pelvis. He didn’t demonstrate tucking; he didn’t correct any of us to tuck. The first place I heard tucking mentioned in relation to Tai Chi was in a question from a Foundations student when I was in training here in Palo Alto. The baseline position I was taught is similar to the “ready position” the Gokhale Method teaches as a first pass in standing.
My second teacher was Dr Paul Lam, founder of the Australia-based Tai Chi for Health Institute. He did not teach tucking either. I therefore questioned the instruction to tuck I was once given in a recertification class. The master trainer I asked confirmed that tucking the pelvis is not taught, and recognized it as an area of confusion. In Tai Chi we often imagine the life force emanating from the depth of the abdomen through the mid back and going forward through the limbs, which could perhaps get misinterpreted as including tucking the pelvis for flow to the legs.
Kathleen finds harmony between Tai Chi and the Gokhale Method.
Roberta studied Argentine Tango dancing and practiced many kinds of mindful meditation before she trained as a Tai Chi teacher. She explains:
My formative experiences included Medical Qigong with Dr. Roger Jahnke, and Wisdom Healing Qigong with Master Mingtong Gu. By chance, I then found a Tai Chi Chih class at my local YMCA. This form was developed in the US by Justin Stone, a Tai Chi Chuan Master, who created a gentle practice that could be learned relatively easily by people of all ages and abilities. It is made up of 19 movements and a final pose.
Justin Stone passed away in 2012. Through photographs and videos of his movements, it is evident that he maintained a J-spine in his practice. Most of the people he mentored who became Tai Chi Chih teachers practice Tai Chi Chih with an anteverted pelvis. However, at least one of the Tai Chi Chih teachers in my teacher training course has not followed the example of his mentor and practices the movements with a tucked pelvis. He also teaches his students and teacher trainees to follow his example, which was uncomfortable for me when I took a class with him. It is interesting to note that this particular teacher also suffered from back pain. Sometimes, the knowledge of a Qigong master can get distorted as it passes from teacher to student.
Recently qualified as a teacher of Qigong, Gokhale Method teacher Julie shares her experience:
I have been practicing Shaolin Qigong for the past 10 years. It is a practice which goes back thousands of years and is rooted in Chinese philosophy and the I-Jing. Qi means energy and Gong means work. The practice is mainly done standing; an emphasis on slow, gentle movements and breath work enables us to feel our energy, develop it, and channel it. It is a great way to practice healthy posture whilst calming the mind and body. Like me, my students often report sleeping like a log after practice!
My Chinese teacher Shi Xinggui has a very clear J-spine. He cannot explain the principles to his students in their language, but throughout his practice we see his behind behind and his relatively straight lumbar spine.
Julie shows that lifting a leg does not mean tucking the pelvis under. Tucked posture and tight hamstrings and hips often result in that habit.
Lang has an interesting personal insight into the question of tucking the pelvis and pelvic angle, which is valuable to our discussion. Lang tells her story:
My father is of Chinese extraction, and like many East Asians, he has a small degree of curvature at L5-S1. When I enrolled in the Gokhale Method Foundation Course as a student over 10 years ago, the teacher mistakenly assumed that I was tucking—and so did I! It took me many months of experimenting (including sticking out my behind and giving myself terrible lower back pain) to realize that I did not in fact tuck when standing, only when sitting. The “stiffness” at L5-S1 that I assumed was present turned out to not be stiffness, but rather my natural structure!
While this experience was frustrating, it taught me a great deal both as a student of posture and a Gokhale Method teacher. I realized that there is an enormous amount of variation in human beings’ L5-S1 angle! As I began to observe people around me in multicultural Toronto, I noticed that healthy pelvises and spines can look quite different in different ethnic groups. I also realized that confusion abounds around healthy pelvic position: For example, I met non-Asian students with sharp L5-S1 angles who practiced Tai Chi, ballet, and other art forms, who had been taught to tuck because their behinds were deemed “too prominent”. While some did have a pronounced sway, others had beautiful J-spines—their “behinds” simply did not match the teacher’s idea of normal!
As Gokhale Method teachers, we have come a long way in fine-tuning our understanding of the ideal pelvic position of each person we encounter.
In summary, people tuck their pelvis because:
1. They misinterpret authentic East Asian teachings.
2. They are trying to compensate for overcontracted muscles of the lumbar spine (a “sway back”, “arching,” “lordosis”.)
A tight, swayed lower back (left) is often misguidedly stretched out by tucking the pelvis and rounding the back (center). A healthy stance (right) requires a realignment of the whole skeleton, as taught in our in-person Foundations course, one-day Immersion course, our online Elements course, plus our Gokhale Active program.
If you are reluctant to second guess a respected teacher who teaches tucking the pelvis, or believe in some positive value of tucking in a particular context, consider returning to a more natural baseline in the rest of your activities. It is important to recognize that what might be taught in a particular practice doesn’t necessarily benefit or belong in your everyday life. Sustained tucking can put pressure on the front of the lumbar discs, especially the wedge-shaped L5-S1 disc, causing it to bulge or even herniate back towards the spinal nerve roots.
This diagram of the lower vertebrae, discs, and sacrum, shows why tucking the pelvis and pulling your “tail” under can do damage to the lower discs and the nerves behind them.
We hope you are inspired to try out one of our healthy posture Moving Meditation classes. Our class schedule is below. See you there!

Best next action steps
If you would like help with finding healthy posture in your activities, get started by booking a consultation, online or in person, with one of our teachers.
You can sign up below to join any one of our upcoming FREE Online Workshops…
So it would be fair to say…
So it would be fair to say that some westerners tucked their pelvis in order to more closely resemble Asian practicioners of Tai Chi who naturally have less of a curve in the lower back. All I can say is that I haven't felt a twinge of pain in mine in the 7 months I've been putting Gokhale into practice, nor is my back as stiff after walking and other exertions. It's also true that I've stopped all Tai Chi And Chi Kung, precisely because I was enjoined to level my pelvis by engaging my core to protect my lower back etc., which sounds confusing now in the light of Esther's message-so thanks for the clarification in the article!
Hello Esther, Thanks for…
Hello Esther, Thanks for posting this. I have been studying and practicing martial arts for the last 40 years. Early in my life I studied Japanese martial arts, particularly Aikido and Isshin Ryu Karate. I began to study the Chinese internal martial arts about 25 years ago and currently teach both tai chi and qigong. During my life I have had the good fortune to study under some very highly skilled Master's, many of whom were of Japanese or Chinese descent, some of whom did not speak English particularly well. The instruction to tuck the pelvis is not resigned solely to tai chi, and it is in fact as you suggest in your article, may have been meant to address the position of the lumbar spine, essentially to take it out of excessive lordotic curve which is something that is quite common particularly in westerners. I will add that this is but one of many teachings that has been misunderstood and or mis-translated as the information was passed from Master to student. The instruction to tuck the pelvis is a bad way to describe what is intended, which is to maintain a neutral neutral pelvis neither tilted forward or back. How do we know this is a mis-understanding or mis-interpretation? Simple. if we test it you note that if the pelvis is tilted anteriorly or posteriorly it inhibits the hip joints and spine and makes efficient, smooth movement "in any direction" more difficult. It also does not allow for energy transfer from the ground, and like pinching off a hose, tucking or tipping the pelvis out of neutral will also inhibit the flow of chi in the central channel up the spine. If you read the tai chi classics you will not find an instruction to tuck the pelvis. There is a second instruction that I think may have contributed to this teaching, namely the instruction that the buttocks should not protrude, which was meant to was also to correct the fault of leaning forward and pushing the buttocks out behind. There is no leaning to the right, left, forward or back. Central Equilibrium, is described very much in the classics as what correct upright posture look like. Another commonly misunderstood instruction is pluck up the back, and hold in the chest. I have heard this translated as round the back and this is also wrong. I have observed some tai chi practitioners literally making their chest overly concave and rounding their shoulders and thoracic spine literally pushing their thoracic spine out to the back. Also an exaggeration of the instruction which simply meant to soften the chest and not pull the shoulders back. Allow the chest and shoulders to be natural not deviated from the central axis.
I took Karate lessons back…
I took Karate lessons back in my twenties. If you look at any really good Karate teachers or students or watch a competition with sparing going on you'll see beautiful alignment and power flowing from the ground up and through the body. They all have a j spine! And they all are well aligned from their head to their feet.
One of my major complaints about the Feldenkrais Method (which I have been taking weekly lessons for over 20 years!) is that it has way too much rounding in it. The Method is basically a neuro muscular retraining practice using awareness of how you move and exploring how to make small changes to create movement with greater ease and comfort. Unfortunately, Moshe had a black belt in Judo which requires lots of rounding and used it in many lessons. He did also base his practice on early childhood movement studying how babies learn to roll over, come to sitting, come to standing, learn to walk, etc. I have a 9 month old granddaughter and I am learning a lot from her!!!! And seeing how so many things designed for babies (strollers, front or back carriers, car seats, etc. are either ok if you're careful or downright awful.
I have seen a few people on a bicycle with a j spine and alignment from head to hip joint and powerful on their bikes. Same in hockey players. Every once in a while there is some one moving faster with incredible grace and they too have the j spine! It's quite thrilling to watch a well-aligned body in movement!
I’ve wondered about this,…
I’ve wondered about this, too. Thanks for the clarifying discussion.
Yes, yes, yes! Thank you. …
Yes, yes, yes! Thank you. More or less ditto blog and other comments! Gokhale zooms with all earlier teachers following covid, put the question of tucking to bed once and for all, as well as a couple other dilemmas that have hung in the air during decades of yoga classes--such as feet position, hyperextending etc. My gut feeling is most teachers I met over the years, simply have not known the spine as Gokhale method does. Took a lot of years to find a yoga instructor where i felt better after class, not worse! The minute i met the Back book, i knew everything i'd wondered about would be clear. FYI Ken Cohen remains root qigong teacher, unsurpassed educator.